April 8, 2011
About a month and a half ago, the
U.S. House of Representatives did something I didn’t think I’d ever see: it
voted overwhelmingly (240 to 185) to end taxpayer funding of Planned
Parenthood (PP), America’s largest abortion provider and apologist. The vote
was on an amendment to a temporary budget bill called a "continuing
resolution."
To their credit, all three of Nebraska’s House
members (Fortenberry, Terry and Smith) voted to defund PP. The U.S. Senate,
however, rejected the House’s continuing resolution (for a variety of
reasons).
The battle to finalize a permanent budget bill for
the federal government’s current fiscal year continues today on a variety of
fronts, including the proposal to defund PP. It is very much uncertain
whether there is sufficient will, or votes, in Congress to actually end
funding to PP.
Planned Parenthood should be defunded. According
to its most recent annual report, PP performed 324,008 abortions in 2008,
which comprised 27 percent of all U.S. abortions that year. Income from
these abortions comprised 37.5 percent ($152 million) of PP’s total clinic
income in 2008. Furthermore, abortions comprise 98 percent of the "services"
PP provides to pregnant women.
Planned Parenthood insists that none of the more
than $360 million of federal funding it receives is used for abortion. While
this may be technically accurate, since the funding is largely for
contraceptive services, it’s irrelevant.
What is relevant, and irrefutable, is that any
federal funding PP receives, even if its use is restricted, benefits the
entire organization. This is especially true given that federal funding
comprises one third of PP’s overall budget.
Therefore, while PP may not use our tax dollars to
directly fund abortions, there is no question that our tax dollars
facilitate PP’s abortion business and advocacy as well as its vulgar,
hedonistic philosophy and programs of sexual education. This philosophy is
readily found on its website (especially under "Info for Teens"). Other
information about PP and its founder Margaret Sanger can be seen online at
www.stopp.org and www.ldi.org/library/.
Planned Parenthood has also tried to shift public
attention away from its abortion extremism by insisting that
women—especially poor women—will not receive health care services if PP is
denied federal funding. This assertion is false. The amendment to defund PP
would simply shift the funding to other entities that provide similar
healthcare services.
While there have been previous attempts in
Congress to defund PP, this year’s success in the House was largely
attributable to the efforts of a college student, Lila Rose. Miss Rose is
founder and president of Live Action, a group that has used under cover
investigations to expose deeply offensive—and potentially illegal—activities
by PP.
A couple of years ago, the investigations exposed
PP’s willingness to accept racist-motivated donations for the purpose of
funding the abortions of black babies. Another investigation exposed PP’s
willingness to cover-up cases of statutory rape. Amazingly, these
revelations received a collective yawn from most of the media and elected
officials.
The most recent Live Action investigations were
even more explosive, clearly showing Planned Parenthood’s willingness to
exploit the victims of child prostitution. Shocking undercover video
footage, from PP clinics in several states, reveals clinic staff assuring a
"pimp" that they would secretly offer full access to abortions and other
services -- despite knowing full well that the girls were underage victims.
To see video clips of these undercover investigations of PP go to
www.liveaction.org. Also check out a new coalition of pro-life groups
urging the defunding of PP at www.exposeplannedparenthood.com. This
latter website urges (and facilitates) Americans to flood the offices of our
Congressmen with e-mails asking them to defund PP. I urge you to do so as
well.
You can contact Greg at The Nebraska
Catholic Conference, 215 Centennial Mall South Suite 310, Lincoln, NE 68508;
gregschlepp@neb.rr.com